Good and thank you.
I'm working through the technical side of things and looking into how things can be different from a legal standpoint. That's the hold up so far.
Oh yeah. I got a number of questions if you dont mind. Firstly, I got hundreds of screenshots from the film already and im planning to take more. Now are we free to take screen caps from the movie and use them in our wikipedia? I know that kind of stuff often falls under the definition copyrighted material.
Another question; how long should the articles be? Is there any actual limit? Ive already started on a wiki article about Bolt and it will probably end up being pretty long. Right now im writing about Bolts part in the plot and how his behavior indicates on intelligence, emotions, personality. Ill stay objective though. I wont offfer and reflections or personal view. I might comment on Bolts ability to open cages or recognize the Hollywood logo.
I will continue with his personality, physical appearance, a little about his design. Ill post some pictures of early concept art. Ill probably finish the article of with a section about Bolts attention in media, reviews and such. Relevant quotations from critics and producers in interviews. Gathering comments and opinion. The goal is to make a extremely long, well written and detailed article presenting any possible information there is to find about Bolt. The article with not only be a great source of information, it will serve as PR for Bolt. In an almost promotional way.
Third question; is it worth or relevant or suitable to mention Bolts attention in the furry fandom, dA or YouTube or any other aspects of the Bolt fandom or Boltology or whatever you wanna call it? I think that Bolt has gained most attention in the furry community being a subject of alot of artwork, (in this context clean ofcourse). Bolt has abit of a fandom himself. There are a certain terminology surrounding Bolt and there are alot of famous characters withing the fandom providing Bolt related media. "AlphaWolfKodi" for example has made himself rather famous on youtube for his ambitious video projects featuring actual original animations. And there are plenty of fanfictions, many of them even good, out there too. Its on the internet Bolt has got the attention he deserves, not in reviews or trailers or anything of the like. Thus one would draw the conclusion that the articles could focus abit on these sorts of matter too.
The only actually problem is see here is the relevance. Referring to a youtube video while writing a wiki-article might not feel too professional. And it wouldnt give our wiki-Boltia the serious impression that this movie deserves. However this can probably be avoided. That will be a later issue.
